Government to retain service provision change
By Anthony Korn
The government has decided not to repeal the TUPE rules on service provision change (SPC). Anthony Korn summarises the government’s response to the consultation document published earlier this year.
The government has decided not to repeal Regulation 3(1)(b) of the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 2006 dealing with changes in service provider. However, the government is to amend the regulations to reflect case law developments that the SPC rules will only apply where the service remains ‘fundamentally or essentially the same’ as that carried out by the previous contractor.
The government’s ‘about turn’ comes as a surprise as the consultation document published earlier this year suggested that it was committed to repeal the SPC rules on the grounds that the rules were ‘anti-competitive’ and amounted to unnecessary ‘gold plating’ of the EU Directive. However, the government appears to have been persuaded that a return to the pre-2006 would have created considerable uncertainty as to when TUPE applied and has accepted that in this instance a certain amount of gold plating is justified…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
A zero-hours contract is not a term of legal art, although a definition has been attempted in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill.
Proprietary estoppel prevents the legal owner of property from asserting their strict legal rights in respect of that property when it would be inequitable to allow him to do so.