Government loses workfare case
Thousands of jobless claimants denied benefits under flagship back-to-work schemes could be in line to share £130m in compensation, after the High Court ruled that the emergency legislation behind the government’s back-to-work scheme was ‘incompatible’ with the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Department for Work and Pensions introduced emergency retrospective legislation in 2013 to stop pay-outs after regulations governing the schemes were found to be legally flawed in an earlier decision by top judges. However, Mrs Justice Lang ruled the retrospective legislation interfered with the ‘right to a fair trial’ under article 6 (1) of the convention.
The case stems from a challenge brought by Cait Reilly in 2012, who maintained that her human rights were breached by her having to participate in an unpaid work placement in a Poundland store, or risk losing her jobseeker’s allowance. The 24-year-old graduate said she had not been told that she would consequently have to give up her voluntary work in a museum, where her career ambitions lay. The Court of Appeal agreed with Ms Reilly that she had not been properly informed about the scheme…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the IBB Solicitors briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.