Google responds to ‘right to be forgotten’ ruling
By Rachel Atkins
Google is primarily based in the US and its usual stance is to stay over there, protected by the US Constitution and the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech.
But the EU has made this more difficult in the recent case regarding the right to be forgotten. In that case, the Court of Justice ruled that individuals can require search engines to rectify, erase or block access to the search engine results about them where they are incomplete, inaccurate, irrelevant or outdated or otherwise breach EU data protection law…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schillings briefing.
Briefings from Schillings
Nine months after the Defamation Act 2013 came into force, we’re starting to see how the court is dealing with its new provisions.
Alison Sharland has been granted permission to appeal her divorce settlement on the basis that her husband misled her over the true value of the parties’ principal asset.
Analysis from The Lawyer
ABSs arrived just two years ago but their impact on the profession is already deep. In a pre-Awards debate, our shortlisters discuss the rough and smooth of the transition