Google defeats Authors’ Guild in US book-scanning dispute
By Zachary Brown
Google has won the latest battle in its long-running dispute with the US Authors’ Guild over its plan to create a digital library of every book in the world. On 14 November 2013, US Circuit Judge Denny Chin ruled in favour of Google in the matter of The Authors’ Guild, Inc et al v Google Inc (05 Civ. 8136 (DC) (SDNY No. 14, 2013)), determining that the Google Books project was permissible under the ‘fair use’ defence in US copyright law.
In 2004, Google announced that it was planning to pursue an ambitious digital books project, termed Google Books. Google Books consisted of two programmes: the Partner Programme (initially called Google Print), encompassing some 2.5 million books displayed with the permission of book publishers and other rights holders; and the Library Project, encompassing some 20 million books (to date) which have been digitised from the collections of a number of major libraries, notably the New York Public Library, the Library of Congress, and the libraries of the universities of Oxford, Harvard, Stanford, California and Michigan, but without the permission of rights holders.
Under the Library Project, Google created an index of all scanned books which enables users to search the full text of books for a word or phrase, returning a list of the most relevant books in which the search term is found, along with links to sellers of the books or libraries which possess the books in their collections. Users may also view ‘snippets’ of books, representing a verbatim extract of one-eighth of a page. Users are prevented from viewing the entire text of books via a system in which at least one snippet on each page and one out of every 10 entire pages in a book are blanked-out and cannot be viewed…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Goodman Derrick
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
Are post-termination restrictions on a recruitment consultant enforceable where information is widely available on social media?
The High Court has held that six-month non-dealing and non-solicitation post-termination restrictions were enforceable by the recruitment business against a former employee.
No, according to the EAT, in the case of a group of agency workers who were assigned to one hirer for periods ranging from between six and 25 years.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Active financial management is vital, but with firms looking more closely at the process of debt and fee collection, the personal touch still counts
The lure of the law can kick in at any stage of life. We speak to four individuals who have made a radical switch to a legal career