Good character evidence: Wisson v Health Professions Council (2013)
The appellant was a podiatrist — Raymond Wisson — registered with the Health Professions Council (HPC, now the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC)). It was alleged by a female colleague that he had made sexually inappropriate comments during a conversation with her at work and had shown her pornographic pictures on his mobile phone. It was also alleged by a patient that Wisson had asked her to attend his place of work after hours, asked her to undress and proceeded to massage her legs and thighs in a sexual manner.
The HPC heard the two separate allegations in one hearing, noting the following common factors in deciding to hear the allegations together:
- both complainants expected other people to be around, but found themselves alone with Mr Wisson
- both incidents lasted for some period of time
- both incidents involved first meetings with Mr Wisson
- both incidents were sexual in nature…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
An employee or witness who is fearful of giving evidence as part of a disciplinary process can cause difficulties for an employer.
Damages recoverable from a tenant: the differences in England and Scotland.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…