Glitches and class meetings in English schemes
By Negeen Arasteh
Where different, equally ranking unsecured noteholders had no realistic prospect of obtaining any return on the alternative scenario of an insolvency, they had a common interest and could vote as a single class. Where proposed modifications were discrete, could be efficiently described in plain language and did not introduce additional class problems, they could be approved to rectify a ‘glitch’.
There were several hearings on a scheme of arrangement (the ‘Scheme’) proposed by the Co-operative Bank Plc (the ‘Bank’) pursuant to section 896 of the Companies Act 2006, which related to seven series of subordinated debt securities (the ‘Notes’) of approximately £937m.
The first question was whether separate class meetings are required for groups of creditors holding the Notes that all differed in the detail of their terms and conditions. The second question was whether to approve a modification of the Scheme for the Bank to correct a ‘glitch’ in the Scheme, which meant that Scheme creditors with smaller holdings of the Notes were able to acquire a disproportionate number of shares at a discount…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
With technological developments and the increase of CCTV in public places, the role of regulation and guidance will become increasingly important.
There have been some high-profile cases involving the use of CCTV in Germany in recent years.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town