Getting your priorities in order — precedence clauses in commercial contracts
The Court of Appeal case of RWE Npower Renewables Ltd v J N Bentley Ltd  EWCA Civ 150 acts as a reminder to draftsman not to place too much reliance on these clauses and highlights the risks when all contractual documents are not properly reviewed before finalising agreements.
RWE engaged Bentley to carry out civil engineering works in relation to a hydro-power scheme in the north of Scotland. The contract value was approximately £4m. At some point during the works, various delays occurred and a dispute arose between the parties regarding when certain sections of the work should have been completed.
The timings for completing the works were set out in different documents. The key section of work in dispute was known as ‘Section 2’, which related to the construction of an intake, some penstock pipeline, a tailrace, a powerhouse and the hydro plant. Failure to complete all works for Section 2 within a certain time would, under the contract, result in Bentley paying liquidated damages to RWE…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Weatherford Global Products Ltd v Hydropath Holdings Ltd and Others concerned the manufacture and supply of the ‘Clearwell Product’.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s real-estate experts bring you the latest property law issues and provide action points to help you and your organisation.