Get your priorities right — Black Ant Co Ltd (in administration)  EWHC 1161
Priority of security is important where a borrower becomes insolvent and its assets are insufficient to discharge all its liabilities. Many funders will require a priority deed or intercreditor agreement to be entered into where there are two or more secured creditors — this will set out the order of repayment and entitlement to proceeds following enforcement of the security. In the absence of such a document, the general rule is that registered charges rank by the order in which they are entered on the register.
A lender who is first in time will want its security to keep its priority in respect of all advances, whether made at the outset or subsequently. ‘Tacking’ is the ability of a funder to secure (tack) further advances under its security so that they rank ahead of sums advanced by (and secured in favour of) another funder. However, the priority given by the general rule is limited to further advances, which the funder is obliged to make at the time of the charge.
In a recent High Court decision — Black Ant Co Ltd (in administration)  EWHC 1161 — the main focus was on what was meant by ‘further advances’. X and Y held a first and a second legal charge respectively over properties owned by two companies. After Y’s charge had been registered, the borrower signed new facility letters with X in respect of the existing loans — no new money was lent and there was no loan repayment. The companies went into administration…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
News from Gateley
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley
Where an agent receives a bribe or secret commission in breach of the duties they owe their principal, who does it belong to?
Some say there are few things more stressful than buying or selling a company. Gateley presents its top tips to help things run smoothly when the big day finally arrives.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Law Society recently published guidance to assist solicitors draw up Shariah-compliant wills, causing outrage in some quarters. Gateley’s Haroon Rashid explains the facts.