German Federal Supreme Court rules on mis-selling claim against direct bank providing execution-only services
On 19 March 2013, under file No XI ZR 431/11, the German Federal Supreme Court clarified the circumstances in which an investor may have a mis-selling claim against a ‘direct bank’ (in other words, a bank holding an account for the deposit of securities on an execution-only basis only).
No implied advisory agreement generally exists between an investor and a direct bank. Incorrect advice by an independent adviser instructed by an investor cannot be attributed to a direct bank. Only the financial institution that has the closest relationship to an investor has a duty to enquire as to investment experience. A direct bank may, however, be liable if it is aware or should have been aware that an investor is receiving negligent advice. The burden of proof is on an investor to show this knowledge…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
In March 2013 the European Commission consulted on proposals to simplify procedures under the EU merger regulation.
Allen & Overy tax partner Lydia Challen has written an article for British Tax Review as part of its analysis of the Finance Act 2013 provisions.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Advisers get stuck into the disentangling task, to unhitch troubled bank from group
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers