German Federal Supreme Court rules on mis-selling claim against direct bank providing execution-only services
On 19 March 2013, under file No XI ZR 431/11, the German Federal Supreme Court clarified the circumstances in which an investor may have a mis-selling claim against a ‘direct bank’ (in other words, a bank holding an account for the deposit of securities on an execution-only basis only).
No implied advisory agreement generally exists between an investor and a direct bank. Incorrect advice by an independent adviser instructed by an investor cannot be attributed to a direct bank. Only the financial institution that has the closest relationship to an investor has a duty to enquire as to investment experience. A direct bank may, however, be liable if it is aware or should have been aware that an investor is receiving negligent advice. The burden of proof is on an investor to show this knowledge…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Keeping track of the latest European developments, as well as domestic trends and changes, can be difficult — all the more so for multinational businesses.
For most HR practitioners and in-house counsel, keeping abreast of domestic legal developments can be challenging. For those with a multi-national remit, the task is huge.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Why has Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) decided to walk away from the Singapore qualifying foreign law practice (QFLP) scheme?
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.