German Federal Fiscal Court ruling potentially provides reduced withholding rates to certain US entities
By Timothy Santoli, Rich Williams and Ryan Zucchetto
In a decision dated 26 June 2013 (Doc No I R 48/12, original available here), the German Federal Fiscal Court (a court of last resort in Germany over tax and custom matters) was tasked with determining whether an ‘S’ corporation (a US corporation that is a pass-through for US tax purposes but not for German tax purposes) is considered a US resident under the 2006 protocol of the German-US income tax treaty (the Treaty). Article 10, Paragraph 2 of the Treaty provides in part that if a German company pays a dividend to a US resident, German withholding tax imposed on the receipt of such dividend shall not exceed (i) five per cent if the beneficial owner of the dividend is a company that directly owns at least 10 per cent of the voting stock of company paying the dividend, or (ii) 15 per cent in all other cases. Article 1, Paragraph 7 of the Treaty generally states that if ‘an item of income… derived by or through a person that is fiscally transparent’ pursuant to US or German law, then ‘such item shall be derived by a resident of a State to the extent that the item is treated for the purposes of the taxation law of such State as the income, profit or gain of a resident.’
In the case, the S corporation, a 50 per cent shareholder of a German company, received dividends from the German company. The German court held that the S corporation was considered a US resident for purposes of the Treaty and thus subject to a reduced withholding tax rate of five per cent. In interpreting Article 1, Paragraph 7 of the Treaty, the German Federal Fiscal Court determined that the two references to ‘resident’ did not necessarily imply the same resident…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
A report issued by WP 29 has raised concerns regarding certain limitations in Québec’s scheme of protection for personal information.
Employer did not breach safety-reprisal settlement when it dismissed employee after harassment investigation
An employer that dismissed an employee after a harassment investigation did not breach a previous safety-reprisal settlement with the employee, the OLRB has held.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.