George Clooney defends future mother-in-law against Daily Mail
By Joelle Rich
Those in the public eye will often have to deal with inaccurate stories that are published about them. We will often step in to assist when allegations are reported that are false, defamatory or in breach of clients’ privacy. When a newspaper apologises, that’s usually the only public acknowledgement that their journalism was not really up to scratch. More recently, clients have sometimes spoken out through their social media accounts to correct false claims and let their fans or followers hear the truth from the horse’s mouth.
In a rare move that goes beyond a 140-character rebuttal, George Clooney has released a long and very public statement condemning the Daily Mail for what he claims was a ‘completely fabricated’ article about his fiancée Amal Alamuddin’s mother, who was reported to be concerned about their upcoming marriage for religious reasons. Clooney said that ‘the idea that someone would inflame any part of that world for the sole reason of selling papers should be criminal’.
The Mail Online has since removed the article and published an apology. In a statement to the press, they said that: ‘The Mail Online story was not a fabrication but supplied in good faith by a reputable and trusted freelance journalist. She based her story on conversations with a long-standing contact who has strong connections with senior members of the Lebanese community in the UK and the Druze in Beirut. We only became aware of Mr Clooney’s concerns this morning and have launched a full investigation. However, we accept Mr Clooney’s assurance that the story is inaccurate and we apologise to him, Miss Amal Alamuddin and her mother, Baria, for any distress caused. We have removed the article from our website and will be contacting Mr Clooney’s representatives to discuss giving him the opportunity to set the record straight.’ …
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schillings briefing.
Briefings from Schillings
Up until now, journalists have been allowed to sit in private divorce hearings but they have, in most cases, been unable to report on most of what they hear.
It looks as if for some the ‘right to be forgotten’ may quickly become a sure-fire way of being remembered.
Analysis from The Lawyer
ABSs arrived just two years ago but their impact on the profession is already deep. In a pre-Awards debate, our shortlisters discuss the rough and smooth of the transition