Full Federal Court confirms a ‘public benevolent institution’ does not need to provide direct relief
The issue in this case was whether to be a ‘public benevolent institution’ the entity must directly provide relief from poverty, sickness, disability, destitution, helplessness or other distress, as opposed to fundraising for other entities that provide relief or some other form of indirect involvement.
A ‘public benevolent institution’ is a particular subtype of charitable body. Endorsement by the Australian Taxation Office is required before an entity can be a public benevolent institution. If endorsed, a public benevolent institution can access a number of tax concessions and be registered as a deductible gift recipient.
One of the available tax concessions is for fringe benefits tax. Benefits provided to employees by an entity that is endorsed as a public benevolent institution are exempt from fringe benefits tax. In this case, Hunger Project Australia sought endorsement in order to access the fringe benefits tax exemption…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The High Court has handed down its decision in Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker — ruling that the implied term of trust and confidence is not part of Australian law.
How would an organisation handle the reinstatement of a dismissed employee while the matter is being heard?