Full Federal Court confirms a ‘public benevolent institution’ does not need to provide direct relief
The issue in this case was whether to be a ‘public benevolent institution’ the entity must directly provide relief from poverty, sickness, disability, destitution, helplessness or other distress, as opposed to fundraising for other entities that provide relief or some other form of indirect involvement.
A ‘public benevolent institution’ is a particular subtype of charitable body. Endorsement by the Australian Taxation Office is required before an entity can be a public benevolent institution. If endorsed, a public benevolent institution can access a number of tax concessions and be registered as a deductible gift recipient.
One of the available tax concessions is for fringe benefits tax. Benefits provided to employees by an entity that is endorsed as a public benevolent institution are exempt from fringe benefits tax. In this case, Hunger Project Australia sought endorsement in order to access the fringe benefits tax exemption…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.