French decree extends the number of sectors in which foreigners cannot invest without state authorisation
By Danhoé Reddy-Girard
On 14 May 2014, France issued a decree extending the number of sectors in which foreigners cannot invest without state authorisation.
When the French government initially became involved with the negotiations regarding GE’s potential acquisition of Alstom’s energy business, the French regulations on foreign investments did not mention energy in the 11 sectors that required a prior authorisation of the state for a foreigner to invest in.
Although Alstom was carrying out certain activities that might have fallen within the scope of the original regulations, such as the maintenance of the turbines of the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, the parties could have dealt with this from the outset or isolated the sale of such activities. That way, they would have avoided applying for an authorisation for energy activities that did not fall within the scope of the original regulations…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Also: collateral purpose of winding-up petition is not an abuse of process; and more.
…despite representation and warranty to the contrary. A helpful decision for lenders