Freedom of choice: EAT confirms selection of companion does not need to be reasonable
In July 2013, the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) held that an employee’s choice of companion for a disciplinary or grievance hearing does not need to be ‘reasonable’ but that compensation for a breach of the right was likely to be low.
That decision has now been re-confirmed in Roberts v GB Oils Ltd, even though the EAT had some concerns about the problems that the decision could cause for employers.
The employee was invited to a disciplinary hearing following allegations of misconduct. He asked to be accompanied to the hearing by a lay trade union official. The employer refused to allow the employee to be accompanied by his preferred companion (for reasons that are not set out in the judgment) but allowed him to be represented by another more senior trade union official. The employee complained that his right to be accompanied by his chosen companion had been breached…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The new Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622), which came into effect on 3 March 2014, is a substantial rewrite of Hong Kong companies law.
Employment News — 14 April 2014: the final straw — employer entitled to take strict view in light of previous warnings
Before his dismissal, the claimant in Disotto Food Ltd v Carlos Santos for misconduct he had been given three warnings about his conduct.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump
When a firm shouts loudly about a landmark merger, as SJ Berwin did when it joined forces with King & Wood Mallesons, departures are always likely to come under the spotlight.