Formula 1 companies ordered to disclose documents in Ecclestone litigation
The High Court has ordered a number of Formula 1 (F1) group companies and CVC Capital Partners Ltd to give disclosure of documents, notwithstanding that they are not parties to litigation in which the orders were made.
In Constantin Medien AG v Ecclestone and others ( EWHC 2674), the claimant, Constantin Medien AG claims that Bayerische Landesbank was induced by a bribe of $44m (£28m) (allegedly paid by Bernie Ecclestone and Bambino Holdings Ltd to Dr Gerhard Gribkowsky) to sell its 46.65 per cent shareholding in the Formula 1 group to CVC Capital for $828m (£520m), which is alleged to be an undervalue.
Dr Gribkowsky was allegedly the chief risk officer and a director in Bayerische at the time of the sale and responsible for matters relating to the sale of Bayerische’s shares in the F1 Group…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
What buildings are affected, what duties are imposed and what action you should take.
HR Update, issue 3: guidance on changing the staff handbook; diabetic employees; flexible leave arrangements; and more
Also: no requirement to take every possible step when investigating whether an employee is disabled.