Foam producers fined €114m as EU Competition Commission reaches cartel settlement
By Jaime Jones
On 29 January 2014, the European Commission announced that it had fined four producers of flexible polyurethane foam products a total of €114m (£94m) for their participation in a cartel.
The commission found that Vita, Carpenter, Recticel and Eurofoam operated the cartel for the purposes of co-ordinating the sale prices of polyurethane foam for comfort and technical applications for a five-year period from October 2005 until July 2010, by organising meetings on the margins of European and national associations. The cartelists were also in contact by telephone and other means.
The price co-ordination, which was designed to avoid aggressive price competition and to pass on raw-material price increases of bulk chemicals, affected foam used in products such as upholstered furniture, mattresses and car seats in 10 member states including the UK…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The importance of companies being able to freely advertise their fees or discounts has again been highlighted by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
One way of seeking to manage cashflow in the construction supply chain is to use the right of set-off, and including a contractual set-off clause can provide significant benefits.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…