Finance lessons from the regulation of UK airports — a case study for Australian airports
Since 2002 when price-cap regulation at Australian capital-city airports was abolished and replaced with light-handed price monitoring by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), airports and airlines have negotiated the terms and conditions of use of aeronautical services without any regulatory intervention or oversight by the ACCC, the National Competition Council (NCC) or the Commonwealth Government.
The Productivity Commission (PC) in 2006 and again in 2011 found that there was no evidence to justify the introduction of any heavier-handed forms of regulation at Australian capital-city airports, including a return to price-cap regulation. Significantly, the Commonwealth Government in 2012 unequivocally accepted the PC’s recommendation in this regard and even demonstrated more confidence in the current light-handed regime than the PC by not accepting the PC’s recommendation to marginally enhance the current form of regulation of airports by giving the ACCC power to issue ‘show cause’ notices to the airports. The Commonwealth Government considered the current form of regulation of Australian airports was working well and no additional powers were needed by the ACCC.
The current economic regulatory framework for Australian airports is not due to be formally reviewed again until 2018, subject to the outcome of the PC’s current non-industry-specific review of Part IIIA. Therefore, Australian airports will have, until 2018 at least, significant flexibility in structuring and setting charges for aeronautical services without any immediate or credible threat of regulatory intervention should agreements not be reached with airlines…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Health Alert — Julia Clare v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority; Dr Reid v Medical Council of NSW; and more
DLA Piper has released the 22 December 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has handed down a landmark judgment concerning the patentability of stem cells in Europe.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.