Final wellness regulations create new programme categories and complications
By Christine L Richardson, Thomas N Makris and Matthew C Ryan
The departments of labour, treasury and health and human services (the ‘departments’) recently published final Affordable Care Act (ACA) regulations on wellness programmes, effective in 2014. The regulations retain the existing distinction between participatory and health-contingent wellness programmes, but clarify that many wellness programmes have been incorrectly classified as participatory. The regulations also split health-contingent wellness programmes into two subcategories subject to new requirements. While reviewing programmes for consistency with these regulations, plans must simultaneously track state and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulatory efforts.
Right now, healthcare cost containment is a top priority for employers, employees and the departments. In this environment, attention has inevitably turned to employer wellness programmes and their potential for improving employee health, reducing long-term costs and providing immediate returns on investment. A recent RAND Corporation report confirms this trend, finding that more than 60 per cent of employers with 100 or more employees sponsor a wellness programme…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Whoever said ‘a verbal contract isn’t worth the paper it’s written on’ did not have this quite right and recent case law confirms they actually had it quite wrong.
US: corrective action catch 22 — Court of Federal Claims holds agency action must be rational even if GAO protest decision was not
The decision in RUSH reflects the unusual circumstance in which the court effectively sat in appellate review of an earlier bid protest decision by the GAO.