FIDIC time bars, instructions and variations
By Allan Skelton
A recent Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision and an adjudication that we acted on have raised interesting issues relating to FIDIC time bar provisions.
The decision in Obrascon Huarte Lain SA v Attorney General for Gibraltar has led to much recent discussion as to the application of the time bar/condition precedent provisions contained within sub-clause 20.1 of the FIDIC Conditions.
These provisions state that if a contractor wishes to claim an extension of time (EOT) or additional payment it must give notice no later than 28 days after it became aware, or should have become aware, of the event or circumstances giving rise to any such claim…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem