Fees for Intervention — HSE’s return on intervention
By George Robers
We’re now almost two years on from when Fees for Intervention (FFI) was introduced by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). In October 2012, the HSE was provided with a statutory power to recover its costs from those in ‘material breach’ of health and safety law.
From very early on, the subjective and uncertain nature of the term ‘material breach’ opened the possibility for legal challenge. However, with the relatively modest level of the average FFI invoice, those faced with the option of either paying an FFI invoice or appealing it, often choose the former.
In the period from October 2012 to July 2014, the HSE issued 26,849 FFI invoices with an average value of circa £509 (or 4.1 hours of the HSE’s time); 9,813 of those invoices were handed out within the construction industry at a total cost of £3.62m, which means that an average invoice in the construction industry would set you back circa £369…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Case law confirms that HR is essential to supporting management when dealing with employee relations issues; however there is a clear difference between supporting a process and influencing a decision.
As it becomes increasingly common for contractual documentation to be concluded electronically, we examine the pros and cons of e-signatures against traditional wet ink signatures.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…