Fee for Intervention — is it last year’s trend?
The Fee for Intervention (FFI) costs recovery regime, which has been in place since October 2012, has imposed a duty on the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to recover its costs for carrying out its regulatory functions against those found to be in material breach of the health and safety laws. A material breach occurs when, in the opinion of the HSE inspector, there has been a contravention of the health and safety law by a business that requires the HSE to issue a written notification to it.
When introducing FFI, the government set out the three main reasons for introducing the regime as being: (a) to reduce public expense; (b) to encourage companies to comply with the law and put faults right swiftly; and (c) to discourage companies from undercutting competitors and putting their employees and the public at risk. The government projections estimated that the introduction of the FFI regime would result in the HSE eventually recovering approximately £37m per year. A Freedom of Information Act request in November 2013 revealed that in its first year of operation the HSE had raised just more than £5.5m from the scheme…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Withers briefing.
News from Withers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Withers
22 April 2014 marked ‘the largest reform of the family justice system any of us have seen or will see in our professional lifetimes’, according to the president of the Family Division.
Withers’ Graham Elliott discusses the points he found most interesting from this year’s Charity Tax Group annual meeting.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A merged Withers and Speechly Bircham would have scaled The Lawyer’s UK 200 with a turnover of about £170m, and created one of the world’s largest specialist private client teams. So what went wrong?