Federal court decision underscores importance of thoughtfully crafting government contractor teaming agreements

In a case that could affect the enforceability of teaming agreements in both state and federal courts, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently held that a teaming agreement that, in the court’s view, amounted to an ‘agreement to agree’ was not an enforceable contract under Virginia law.

The case, Cyberlock Consulting Inc v Info. Experts Inc, 2013 WL 1395742 (E.D. Va. April 3, 2013), is significant for government contractors that rely on teaming agreements to form binding contractual commitments to secure and ultimately perform contracts with the US government. While the future of the Cyberlock holding is uncertain — Cyberlock has appealed the district court’s decision and the case will soon go before the Fourth Circuit — the case highlights critical issues for government contractors to consider when entering into teaming agreements. Contractors should no longer assume teaming agreements that are tentative ‘agreements to agree’ will be enforceable in the state and federal courts that ultimately follow Cyberlock. Without concrete and unqualified subcontract terms, those courts applying Virginia law may be reluctant to enforce teaming agreements under this decision. An understanding of the case and its ramifications is thus essential for government contractors that anticipate using teaming agreements to form teams to pursue future prime contracts.

In the fall of 2008, Cyberlock, a company that provides cyber-security services to the US government, entered into a teaming agreement with Information Experts (IE) to secure a prime contract from the US Office of Personnel Management. Upon receiving the contract, IE subcontracted with Cyberlock pursuant to the terms of their agreement, and Cyberlock completed its work on the project in September 2011…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Hogan Lovells

View more briefings from Hogan Lovells

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Atlantic House
Holborn Viaduct

Turnover (£m): 1,098.00
No. of lawyers: 2,313 (UK 200)
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 8
No. of qualified lawyers: 219 (International 50)
No. of partners: 56