Federal Circuit limits ITC authority to remedy patent infringement claims based on induced infringement

In a groundbreaking decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that a limited exclusion order under section 337 may not be predicated on a theory of induced infringement when the subject imported product did not directly infringe before or at importation.

The case involves certain method patent claims relating to particular implementations of fingerprint image capture and processing. In the underlying investigation, Cross Match Technologies alleged that Suprema (a South Korean company that manufactures and imports hardware and software for scanning fingerprints) and Mentalix (a domestic importer of Suprema scanners) violated section 337 by importing articles that infringe certain Cross Match patents. Cross Match alleged that the method claims at issue were infringed when Suprema’s scanners are used in combination with Mentalix’s scanners.

The commission held that Mentalix directly infringed a Cross Match patent method claim by using its own software with imported Suprema scanners and that Suprema had induced the direct infringement by Mentalix. The commission accordingly issued a limited exclusion order directed to certain scanning devices imported ‘by or on behalf of Suprema or Mentalix’ and issued a cease-and-desist order directed to Mentalix…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in

Register

It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer

 

Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.

 

Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.

 

Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • Panel reviews

    Panel reviews 2014: The chosen ones

    Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all

  • training

    Accutrainee: Revolution postponed

    At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.

View more analysis from The Lawyer

Overview

One Bishops Square
London
E1 6AD
UK
http://www.allenovery.com

Turnover (£m): 1,234.30
No. of lawyers: 2,194 (UK 200)
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 11
No. of qualified lawyers: 273 (International 50)