FCC Enforcement Monitor — October 2013
By Scott R Flick and Paul A Cicelski
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a forfeiture order in the amount of $14,400 (£9,000) to a California television licensee for failing to keep its online public inspection file up to date and for not responding to the FCC’s letters of inquiry.
Earlier this year, the FCC issued a notice of apparent liability for forfeiture (NAL) against the licensee, asserting that the station had failed to place required documentation in its online public inspection file and failed to respond to FCC letters of inquiry. The NAL concluded that the licensee should be assessed a $16,000 forfeiture for these violations, which was comprised of $10,000 for the public file violation and $6,000 for failure to respond to the FCC’s correspondence.
Although the usual penalty for failure to respond is $4,000, the FCC imposed the higher penalty of $6,000 on this licensee because its ‘misconduct was egregious and repeated’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
California courts are clarifying potential liability under the CMIA of healthcare providers, health plans, pharmaceutical companies and others for the unauthorised disclosure of medical information.
The California Supreme Court in Iskanian v CLS Transportation Los Angeles held that its decision in Gentry v Superior Court is no longer good law.