Falling between two stools — employees could not bring claims against transferee over failure to provide TUPE information
Allen v Morrisons Facilities Services Ltd involved the transfer of several hundred employees as part of a large-scale change of service providers of the council’s housing maintenance services. The issue for the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was whether transferring employees could bring claims for a protective award against the transferee employers on the basis that they had failed to provide information to the transferor employers in accordance with the requirements of the TUPE regulations.
Employees can only bring a complaint about a failure to inform and consult against their employer at the time of the alleged breach — in this case, the transferor not the transferee…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump