Failure to consent: financial penalty for consultation failure
All enterprise agreements impose mandatory obligations on employers to consult with employees about ‘major’ changes in the workplace. These obligations are not only relevant to unfair dismissal claims, but a failure to comply can result in fines and penalties. A recent decision of the federal circuit court of Australia emphasises the importance of the obligations and demonstrates the willingness of courts to impose a penalty even for a single contravention.
In CEPU v ThyssenKrupp Elevator Australia Pty Ltd, a penalty of $15,300 (£8,546) was imposed on the employer for neglecting to consult with an employee whom it made redundant. The court stressed that consultation was an ‘important and valuable right’ and it is imperative for employers to properly understand the nature of their obligation.
Under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) it is mandatory for enterprise agreements to contain a clause requiring employers to consult with its employees about…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The interpretation of the scope of application of the investor’s right to withdraw from any contracts for the placement of door-to-door financial products has again captured the attention of all players.
Tax Newsletter — July/August 2014: SAT strengthens reporting request under China CFC rules; and more
DLA Piper has released the July/August edition of its Tax Newsletter, which provides a review of PRC and Hong Kong tax developments.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions