Failing to proceed with due diligence: can this constitute a repudiatory breach of a building contract?
By Andrew Outram
The Technology and Construction Court examined this issue in Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd and Vivergo Fuels Ltd v Redhall Engineering Solutions Ltd and found in each case that it was not a repudiatory breach on the facts of the case.
The cases involved a similar set of facts; namely a contractor was appointed under a contract to construct certain works on a project. In each case, but for different reasons, the contractor fell into substantial delay and the relevant employer invoked the contractual termination provisions of the contract to terminate it.
In both cases, the contractor challenged the contractual termination and the employer resisted the challenge on the basis that the contracts had been validly terminated or, if they had not, that the failure to proceed diligently constituted a repudiatory breach of contract…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Court of Appeal has found in favour of a business tenant and decided that a periodic tenancy had not been created in the intervening period.
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…