Factors the EAT will take into account when making an order for the repayment of an appellant's fees
In Horizon Security Services Ltd v Ndeze and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the factors that should be taken into account when considering making an order for repayment of a successful appellant’s EAT fees.
A party pursuing an appeal in the EAT must pay an issue fee of £400 and a hearing fee of £1,200. The EAT has the discretion to make a costs order against a respondent in respect of some or all of the EAT fees paid by the appellant where the appeal is successful in full or in part. This is set out in rule 34(A) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993/2854 (as amended).
In this case, Horizon Security Service was successful in its appeal against the employment tribunal’s decision finding in favour of Mr Ndeze. Mr Ndeze did not participate in the EAT proceedings. Horizon paid the full £1,600 in EAT fees and applied for the EAT to exercise its discretion to make a costs order against Mr Ndeze in respect of the EAT fees…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has made waves in Manchester by offering the city’s paralegals turbocharged salaries to switch allegiances.
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all