Expert determination: a wise choice?
By Harriet Campbell
If parties wish to use expert determination to resolve disputes between them, they will insert a specific expert determination clause into their contract or specifically agree that course of resolution when a dispute arises.
Typically, expert determination clauses provide for a technical expert (such as an accountant) to resolve disputes arising out of corporate transactions. The expert’s remit is generally defined solely by the contract and the determination is normally binding (absent fraud or obvious error).
While the process is dependent on the contract, the basic structure often follows an established pattern. After making submissions to the expert (who shares all communications with all parties), the parties normally respond to each other’s submissions and make any counter-responses. The expert then makes enquiries and asks questions of the parties if appropriate. A final and binding written decision is then issued by the expert, which can be with or without reasons…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
An employee or witness who is fearful of giving evidence as part of a disciplinary process can cause difficulties for an employer.
Damages recoverable from a tenant: the differences in England and Scotland.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…