European Court of Human Rights upholds appeal against France by Paris-Match
By Ben Hobbs
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has upheld an appeal brought against France in respect of the French courts’ decisions in favour of Prince Albert of Monaco, against Paris-Match.
In May 2005, Paris-Match published an article claiming that Prince Albert had an illegitimate son. The prince’s French privacy claims succeeded because the Constitution of Monaco does not allow an illegitimate child to become monarch. As a consequence, the French courts determined there was no debate of general interest and Paris-Match was ordered to pay €50,000 (£40,000) and publish a full front-page feature, including details of the judgment. The conditions in respect of the feature were lessened on appeal, but the overall judgment was upheld.
The key challenge for the ECHR was to determine whether the article contributed to a debate of general interest. While three judges believed the main purpose of the article was to appeal to public curiosity about Prince Albert’s private life, four judges ruled that there was a debate of general interest and therefore the French court judgments constituted an infringement of Paris-Match’s Article 10 rights to freedom of expression. While the prince was entitled to privacy, because of his political position, the ECHR’s view was that such individuals need to display a greater degree of tolerance…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schillings briefing.
Briefings from Schillings
Nine months after the Defamation Act 2013 came into force, we’re starting to see how the court is dealing with its new provisions.
Alison Sharland has been granted permission to appeal her divorce settlement on the basis that her husband misled her over the true value of the parties’ principal asset.
Analysis from The Lawyer
ABSs arrived just two years ago but their impact on the profession is already deep. In a pre-Awards debate, our shortlisters discuss the rough and smooth of the transition