European Court of Human Rights upholds appeal against France by Paris-Match
By Ben Hobbs
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has upheld an appeal brought against France in respect of the French courts’ decisions in favour of Prince Albert of Monaco, against Paris-Match.
In May 2005, Paris-Match published an article claiming that Prince Albert had an illegitimate son. The prince’s French privacy claims succeeded because the Constitution of Monaco does not allow an illegitimate child to become monarch. As a consequence, the French courts determined there was no debate of general interest and Paris-Match was ordered to pay €50,000 (£40,000) and publish a full front-page feature, including details of the judgment. The conditions in respect of the feature were lessened on appeal, but the overall judgment was upheld.
The key challenge for the ECHR was to determine whether the article contributed to a debate of general interest. While three judges believed the main purpose of the article was to appeal to public curiosity about Prince Albert’s private life, four judges ruled that there was a debate of general interest and therefore the French court judgments constituted an infringement of Paris-Match’s Article 10 rights to freedom of expression. While the prince was entitled to privacy, because of his political position, the ECHR’s view was that such individuals need to display a greater degree of tolerance…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schillings briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Schillings
Briefings from Schillings
Investors are increasingly looking to hedge-fund owners to identify threats and protect their investments.
Beneficial ownership of assets is coming under scrutiny in hedge fund divorce cases, requiring the disclosure of great swathes of confidential information.
Analysis from The Lawyer
ABSs arrived just two years ago but their impact on the profession is already deep. In a pre-Awards debate, our shortlisters discuss the rough and smooth of the transition