European Court chooses ‘static’ approach to effect of TUPE on collectively agreed pay terms
In Alemo-Herron v Parkwood Leisure Limited the claimants’ contracts provided that their terms and conditions were ‘in accordance with collective agreements negotiated from time to time’. Prior to a TUPE transfer a series of pay increases had been agreed by the negotiating body (made up of local authority employers and trade unions). These were honoured by the transferee.
A subsequent collective agreement entered into after the transfer provided for pay increases going forward. The issue was whether the transferee, which did not recognise the union and was not a party to the collective negotiations that took place after the transfer, was bound by the new pay rates contained in that agreement, over which it had no control.
The issue is particularly relevant in situations where employees who have traditionally been subject to collective bargaining (typically the public sector) subsequently transfer to employers who do not recognise unions or bargain collectively…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump