EU: retention denied — ECJ declares Data Retention Directive invalid
On 8 April 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) declared the Data Retention Directive, which had been the subject of great debate, invalid. The directive required telecommunications providers to retain certain categories of traffic and location data in order to allow law enforcement authorities to access this data for the purpose of (severe) crime and terrorism prevention and prosecution.
Eight years after the directive entered into force, the ECJ has now declared the directive invalid. It is the ECJ’s view that the directive interferes with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data (articles 7 and 8 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union). It is worth noting that in its ruling, the ECJ states that the data retention obligation as provided by the directive does not per se interfere with the cited fundamental rights and that this obligation principally serves legitimate public interests. However, the ECJ has taken the view that the directive is disproportionate, as the interference it causes with the said fundamental rights goes beyond the extent absolutely necessary to achieve the objectives pursued by the directive.
The ECJ states that the directive affects individuals, communications and related data in an all-embracing manner without differentiating properly. The ECJ is primarily concerned about the fact that the directive does not sufficiently define the severity of the crimes to be prosecuted by means of the retained data…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schoenherr briefing.
News from Schoenherr
Briefings from Schoenherr
Slovenian legislation is still lagging behind in transposing the IPPC/IED baseline reporting requirements into national environmental law.
On 25 July 2014, the Polish Parliament passed on an amendment of the Public Procurement Law.