EU custom enforcement: the ECJ on the seizure of infringing goods sold by non-EU websites
On 7 February 2014, the European Court of Justice (Case 98-13) issued a ruling pertaining to the interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) no. 1383/2003.
In the underlying case, a Danish citizen, Mr Blomqvist, purchased on a Chinese online shop one counterfeit Rolex watch, allegedly for personal use. Following the seizure of the item by the Danish customs authority, Rolex sought Blomqvist’s consent to the destruction of the same. Blomqvist opposed such request and denied any infringement, on the claim that he bought the watch for personal use from a non-EU website that was not targeting the EU market…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
Geographical indications (GIs) for foodstuffs are protected under European law, while GIs for non-foodstuffs are not protected under EU law. Should we keep this difference?
In the last couple of days, the Financial Times and The New York Times have published important articles on Russia and China. The articles don’t pull their punches.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms