Establishing a Luxembourg SOPARFI
A SOPARFI (société de participation financière), in straightforward terms, is an ordinary, unregulated, commercial company used extensively in Luxembourg. It is a generic term and does not refer to a specific legal form of corporate entity.
The most common legal forms a SOPARFI can take are a private limited liability company (‘société à responsabilité limitée’, commonly abbreviated to S.à r.l.) and a public limited liability company (‘société anonyme’, commonly abbreviated to SA).
Both a S.à r.l. and a SA are formed under the Commercial Companies Law 1915 (as amended), which stipulates the minimum share capital each vehicle should have; €12,500 (£9,950) in the case of a S.à r.l. and €31,000 for a SA. There are several other differences between the two types of vehicles…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ogier briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ogier
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ogier
Decisions over the past 12 months will provide considerable comfort to those concerned about exposure to clawback action.
The High Court of England and Wales may refuse to exercise its discretion to wind up companies incorporated abroad where there would be little likelihood of the petitioners deriving benefit from the winding-up.