Ensure your distribution agreement runs like clockwork — beware of banning exports to Switzerland
Manufacturers and suppliers experienced in entering into EU distribution agreements will be aware that there are limits upon the restrictions that they may lawfully place upon on their resellers — including in respect of territorial restrictions. But what about the impact of such distribution agreements on Switzerland given that Switzerland is not in the European Union (EU) or the European Economic Area (EEA)?
A swathe of recent decisions and investigations by the Swiss competition authority in relation to parallel import restrictions — for example Nikon in respect of cameras, certain beer manufacturers and piano manufacturer Steinway & Sons — highlight that the Swiss competition authority will not take lightly the restriction of trade into Switzerland and resulting higher prices for consumers.
Manufacturers should therefore be careful not to carve Switzerland out of EEA/EU distribution arrangements, thereby restricting parallel trade into Switzerland…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
The case of Savoye and Savoye Ltd v Spicers Ltd serves as a reminder that the provisions of Part II of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
2014 was all about age, says Ruth Ormston from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s combined human resource solutions team, in this article that was originally published on Thomson Reuters.