Ensure restrictive covenants in a sale agreement are enforceable (as the courts won’t do it for you)
The Court of Appeal has recently overturned a decision of the High Court in which the judge read words into a restrictive covenant clause to reflect what he determined the parties had in mind at the time of drafting. The Court of Appeal decision underlines the importance of ensuring that any non-compete restriction in a sale agreement is clear and fully reflects the intention of the parties. The court generally will not correct poor draughtsmanship, which makes the clause ineffective.
The case of Prophet plc v Huggett  EWCA Civ 1013 concerned a restrictive covenant that attempted to restrict Mr Huggett from competing with software manufacturer Prophet when he left the business ‘in connection with any products… which he was involved whilst employed’. As he would only have been involved in working with Prophet’s proprietary software during his employment, the restrictive covenant — when read literally — provided no protection for Prophet. Once Mr Huggett began working for a competitor, he would no longer be dealing with Prophet’s software but with that of the competitor…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Kemp Little briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Kemp Little
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Kemp Little
Despite the efforts of The Apprentice candidates, wearable technology is no laughing matter; this £450m industry is becoming increasingly popular, both in and outside the workplace.
Tthe court has held that an exchange of emails between the claimants’ and defendants’ respective solicitors constituted a binding settlement in relation to litigation, and that a formal settlement agreement was not necessary.