Enhanced redundancy terms implied into the contract of employment
By Allison Cook
Was a consistent practice of paying enhanced redundancy payments capable of being implied into individual contracts of employment, meaning that paying the statutory minimum alone amounted to a breach of contract by the employer?
In the case of Peacock Stores v Peregrine & Others, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) said yes.
For a custom and practice to become a contractual term, it must be reasonable, widely known and certain. It must also be followed because the parties feel a legal obligation to do so…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Veale Wasbrough Vizards briefing.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Squatting in residential premises has been a criminal offence since September 2012. However, this month, a case has considered this in relation to the law of adverse possession.
The EAT has found that while age discriminatory comments had been made to a former employee, these had not formed a material part of the employee’s constructive dismissal.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories