English Court of Appeal promotes arbitration... by setting aside arbitral award
In MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC  EWCA Civ 156, the English Court of Appeal upheld the enforceability of a supply contract despite the parties having failed to agree certain details. The Court of Appeal’s decision gives useful guidance on so-called ‘agreements to agree’, and promotes the use of arbitration by finding that contractual mechanisms for dispute resolution support certainty of contract.
MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC  EWCA Civ 156 concerned an arbitral tribunal’s finding that a cross-border supply contract was void for uncertainty. By setting aside the tribunal’s award, the Court of Appeal confirmed that arbitration clauses can cure apparently uncertain or incomplete terms. This is because arbitration clauses provide an agreed mechanism for giving content to the contract. The Court of Appeal‟s decision is a useful reminder of the benefits of arbitration for parties negotiating contracts for future performance…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the KWM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
High Court decides: liquidators of insolvent landlords can disclaim leases with the effect of extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest
In Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease.
Queensland recently brought an interlocutory application seeking a declaration that its laws were valid until a court finally determined otherwise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out