End of the road: final outcome of Seldon compulsory retirement litigation
The dispute between Mr Seldon and law firm Clarkson Wright & Jakes, goes back to May 2006. At that point, his fellow partners rejected a proposal that would have allowed him to continue working as a consultant or salaried partner for three years beyond the partnership retirement age of 65. On 1 October the same year, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031) came into effect. Seldon automatically ceased to be a partner at the end of 2006 in accordance with the partnership deed.
He began proceedings in the employment tribunal in March 2007. The scheme of the regulations, now substantially re-enacted in the Equality Act 2010, outlawed all forms of age discrimination against individuals in a work context, subject to a justification defence and a number of specific exceptions. The most significant of these was the default retirement age. Until its abolition in April 2011, it allowed employers to retire workers compulsorily at the age of 65 without facing claims for age discrimination. There was, however, no analogous exemption for partners…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why