Employment tribunal costs: difficulties of recovery against a losing party
By Simon Fennell
Lord Sugar’s recent win in an employment tribunal proved bittersweet when he was unable to recover any of his costs, but his experience is far from unusual.
The starting point for litigation in the employment tribunal, unlike other courts, has always been that both parties bear their own costs and the losing party is not automatically required to contribute to the winner’s legal expenses. However, in certain, very limited circumstances it is possible to ask a tribunal to make an award of costs.
Lord Sugar is just the latest in a line of frustrated respondents unable to persuade an employment tribunal to award costs against a losing claimant. In his case, not even a judgment stating that the case ‘should never have been brought’ was sufficient for Lord Sugar to be able to recover some of the £50,000 costs that had been incurred in defending a claim for unfair dismissal by former winner of The Apprentice Stella English…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
In 2013 global pop sensation Rihanna took legal action against the retail giant and its parent company Arcadia for using an image of her on a T-shirt and succeeded in the High Court with her claim of passing-off.
In the past five years planning promotion agreements – also known as land promotion agreements – have become popular with both landowners and developers as an alternative to option agreements.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…