Employment News — 27 January 2014: no deal: claimant’s rejection of offer to settle did not justify costs award
The claimant was dismissed from her job as a bank branch manager on conduct grounds, following an incident where she had left the branch safe open. She brought claims of unlawful sex and race discrimination, unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal in the tribunal.
Before the tribunal hearing, the bank, in a ‘Calderbank’-style letter, offered the claimant £25,000 to compromise the claims under a COT3 agreement. The offer was rejected by the claimant and she asked for a revised offer close to her estimated loss figure of £1.2m, which included a whole-career loss-of-earnings claim. No further offer was forthcoming before the liability hearing, at which the discrimination claims were dismissed and the unfair-dismissal complaint upheld, subject to a deduction of two thirds to reflect the claimant’s contribution to her dismissal by her conduct…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump