Employment Matters — February 2014: settlement negotiations ‘subject to contract’
A recent case in the high court (Newbury v Sun Microsystems) illustrates the importance of ensuring that all settlement negotiations are stated to be ‘subject to contract’ — otherwise you could find yourself bound by a contract you did not intend to make.
In this case, in the context of a claim for unpaid commission, the employer’s solicitor wrote to the employee’s solicitor to propose an offer of payment ‘in full and final settlement of the claim’ to be paid within a certain time frame, with provision that ‘such settlement [was] to be recorded in a suitably worded agreement’.
The claimant’s solicitor accepted this offer on the claimant’s behalf in a letter marked ‘without prejudice save as to costs’ and agreed to forward a draft agreement setting out the terms. There was then a disagreement over the form of the agreement and the employer decided that it no longer wished to proceed with the settlement…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Collyer Bristow briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Collyer Bristow
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Collyer Bristow
Stephen Critchley and Robert Andrews describe what the alleged manipulation is; who may have suffered from it; and the ongoing investigations into it.
In Prophet plc v Huggett, the High Court came to the surprising decision that it could reword a badly drafted restriction in an employment contract.