Employment Matters — February 2014: duty of employer to pay for employee’s counselling
The Employment Appeal Tribunal, in the claim of Croft Vets Ltd and others v Butcher, considered whether a veterinary practice — by failing to pay for a depressed employee’s private psychiatric treatment — had breached its duty to make reasonable adjustments to enable her to return to work.
The claimant had worked for a number of years as a finance and reception manager at the practice. From 2008 to 2010, due to a combination of additional duties and the serious illness of her mother, the claimant came under severe pressure and her performance began to suffer.
In March 2010, she was relieved of several of her duties and told to concentrate on just one. However, in April 2010, after she was found in tears, the claimant was offered two choices by her employer: (i) continue with her current role and take steps to improve her performance; or (ii) narrow her job description and take a pay cut. The following week, the claimant was signed off sick with depression…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Collyer Bristow briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Collyer Bristow
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Collyer Bristow
Stephen Critchley and Robert Andrews describe what the alleged manipulation is; who may have suffered from it; and the ongoing investigations into it.
In Prophet plc v Huggett, the High Court came to the surprising decision that it could reword a badly drafted restriction in an employment contract.