Employment Law Watch: the new law — too good to be true?
As of 29 July, employers can enter into confidential negotiations with an employee with the aim of terminating their employment. In other words, evidence of those conversations will be inadmissible in a court or tribunal in a similar way to the common law ‘without prejudice’ principle, but without the need for a pre-existing dispute. Conversely, employees are also afforded the same protection if they choose to start the conversation (although that is a lot less common).
This sounds like a liberating new right. It should mean that you can have a frank and honest discussion with any employee you no longer wish to employ without worrying about these discussions tainting any formal disciplinary/grievance process or being used as evidence against you in future litigation. However, as with most things that look too good to be true, it is. There are limitations with the new protection that mean, broadly speaking, you should still approach these discussions in the same manner as you have up until now…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe