Employment law 2014 preview: TUPE
We begin the year with the changes to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE), which came into force on 31 January (subject to a couple of provisions which will not take effect immediately).
While less radical than originally proposed, the changes allow for a bit more flexibility, removing some legal obstacles to the everyday operation of TUPE, such as the changes on redundancy consultation. We also have some helpful changes: post-transfer changes to location can amount to an ‘economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce’ (an ETO reason) so that redundancies due to a simple change of location will not be automatically unfair.
However, the impact of other changes is not fully apparent at present. For transfers before 31 January 2014, the protective provisions for dismissals or changes to terms apply if the sole or principal reason for the relevant action is either the transfer itself or in connection with the transfer (unless, in the latter case, it is an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce). Now, the two distinct concepts of the ‘transfer itself’ and ‘in connection with the transfer’ have been replaced by a new single concept of ‘the transfer’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
There seems to be a growing recognition that retaining the skills of the older worker makes sound business sense. But are we neglecting our younger potential workforce?
Benefit change exercises — what are the practical implications of the IBM case for trustees and employers?
The latest IBM case has implications for employers and trustees when considering changes to members’ pension benefits. But what implications?