Employment law 2013 review: age discrimination
This year the Court of Appeal confirmed in Lockwood v Department for Work & Pensions that differences in severance payments on voluntary redundancy between older and younger workers could be objectively justified and was not unlawful age discrimination.
The enhanced payment to older workers was found to be a legitimate way of providing a financial cushion for older workers and recognised the problems that they would experience when they lost their jobs. This is potentially good news for older workers, and for employers who seek to provide age-related voluntary redundancy packages.
However, as with all age cases, each case is likely to be fact specific and require evidence that the means chosen by the employer to achieve its aims were proportionate in the particular circumstances…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s employment &and equalities experts bring you the latest developments that may affect your business – what they are, an
The Court of Appeal looked at when a public body is required to appoint new decision makers where a decision has been held to be unlawful and is remitted to the body to be retaken.