Employment fissuring in franchising: NLRB pursues McDonald’s
By Erik B Wulff, Harriet A Lipkin and Dianne Rose LaRocca
On 29 July, the general counsel (GC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced that, absent settlement, he has directed the issuance of complaints in 43 unfair labour practice (ULP) cases, alleging that McDonald’s franchisees and their franchisor, McDonald’s USA, were joint employers, jointly responsible for alleged unfair labour practices engaged in at franchisee restaurants. The NLRB GC’s decision is significant because it further illustrates that the franchise model — and its underpinning that franchisees are separate and independent businesses — is under attack on several fronts.
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is the federal labour law that provides non-supervisory, private sector employees with the right to engage in or refrain from union and other protected concerted activities. An employer commits a ULP when it interferes with protected employees’ NLRA rights. NLRA violations may be remedied with ‘make-whole’ remedies, including back pay, reinstatement, rescission of unlawfully issued discipline and the posting of a notice to employees in which the employer notifies its employees of their federal rights and commits to comply with federal labour law. Punitive damages and/or fines are not available under the statute.
The procedure likely to follow the NLRB GC’s decision to issue the complaint is as follows: a trial before a NLRB administrative law judge (ALJ) will be scheduled; an NLRB lawyer will prosecute the case; the ALJ will issue a decision; the ALJ’s decision will be submitted to the NLRB for a final NLRB decision; and decisions of the NLRB may be appealed and/or enforced in a US Court of Appeals…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Health Alert — Julia Clare v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority; Dr Reid v Medical Council of NSW; and more
DLA Piper has released the 22 December 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has handed down a landmark judgment concerning the patentability of stem cells in Europe.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.