Employment Appeal Tribunal decision confirms no extension of civil partners’ survivor benefits
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed that the restriction of a surviving civil partner’s pension to the member’s post-4 December 2005 pensionable service (in relation to non-contracted-out rights) is compatible with EU law.
Mr Walker had been a member of his company’s occupational pension scheme for more than 20 years. He argued that his civil partner should be entitled to the full value of a spouse’s death-in-service pension, and not just the benefits arising from the date the Civil Partnership Act 2004 came into force (5 December 2005).
Mr Walker had been a member of the Innospec company pension scheme since joining the business in 1980. He entered into a civil partnership with his long-standing partner on 23 January 2006. He asked for confirmation of what his civil partner would be entitled to in the event of his death while he was a member of the pension scheme…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s dedicated insolvency litigation team brings you its monthly update on the issues affecting the insolvency and fraud investigation industry.
Birss J rules on product by process claim construction, extension of scope, added matter and obviousness in Hospira v Genentech.