Employer’s position selection criteria found to demonstrate indirect racial discrimination
By Jessica Bowman
The New South Wales Administrative Decisions Tribunal has upheld an employee’s claims of indirect racial discrimination because the employer’s selection criteria disproportionately excluded members of a certain race.
The employee worked as a grade-two pharmacist for a number of years. He applied for a grade-three position in March 2011, but was unsuccessful. One of the selection criteria was ‘demonstrated excellence in at least one clinical speciality practice’. The applicant (and all other Arabic pharmacists at the hospital) could not meet the requirement because he was a rotating, rather than a specialist, pharmacist. Even though this criterion was not the basis cited for rejecting his application, the employee was able to show that he would not have been able to satisfy the requirement for a promotion…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
Principals and contractors need to be aware that in not registering security interests under the PPSA 2009, they may risk serious consequences.
The New Companies Ordinance (NCO) will come into effect on 3 March 2014. It includes changes that affect the way documents may be executed.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out