Employers can dismiss for ‘last-straw’ failures: a brief guide
The High Court has recently confirmed that the so-called ‘last-straw’ doctrine applies to employers as much as it does to employees. In brief, the doctrine allows an employee to resign in response to an event that in itself may be insubstantial but that taken together with a chain of earlier events amounts to a fundamental breach of contract. The court made clear that employers too may rely on an employee’s repudiatory behaviour as the basis for bringing the employment to an end.
As far as we know, the court’s decision in Kearns v Glencore UK Ltd is the first to deal with an employer’s reliance on the last-straw doctrine. In effect, the decision levels the playing field between employers and employees in this context.
There are lessons for employers to learn from this decision, as well as from a number of related recent judgments dealing with gross misconduct claims. We summarise these lessons briefly below, and in detail in the body of this briefing…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
Non-Chinese contractors are regularly encountering contracts containing arbitration clauses providing for disputes to be determined by Chinese arbitration centres.
This note provides a short summary of the two formal insolvent liquidation processes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem